Lulled into a sense of unreality by my Thai-settled-in-Berkeley-for-21-years hairdresser's reminiscences of times gone by, I almost coloured my hair blue yesterday. Thankfully, better senses (or, more accurately, hunger pangs and a well-informed email from Fanny) prevailed.
However, I did end up with hair about 1.5 inches shorter than I wanted (and asked for). I wanted a Victoria Beckham and ended up with a mad pixie*.
Today, as I went to my usual coffee shop to get coffee (decked out in eyeliner, mascara and lippy), the coffee chap complimented the new hair and joked about it being very "rock star" (and I'm not a rock star type at all).
* I'm not implying that lady is a mad pixie at all. I, however, seem to look like what I'd imagine an irritated pixie to look like.
Showing posts with label fashionable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fashionable. Show all posts
Monday, July 21, 2008
Monday, May 05, 2008
next stop: cover of Vogue
Fanny's inspired me to do some non-fluffy blogging. Hopefully. But not now. Not this week when I have over 30 twenty-page papers to grade by Friday and a journal issue to finish editing (due to publishers' by next week, thanks) and a chapter to finish revising (due to advisor also by next week).
So what do I do when not wondering whether a quick trip to the local cave to be a hermit might not be a bad idea after all? I do online tests. I'm actually rather obsessed by online tests. I take them wherever and whenever I can. And, sometimes, they turn out funny.
Fanny will prob laugh her fanny off at this (I promise I didn't actually lie about any of the answers. I think the test is broken):
This test tracked 4 variables. How the score compared to the other people's:
So what do I do when not wondering whether a quick trip to the local cave to be a hermit might not be a bad idea after all? I do online tests. I'm actually rather obsessed by online tests. I take them wherever and whenever I can. And, sometimes, they turn out funny.
Fanny will prob laugh her fanny off at this (I promise I didn't actually lie about any of the answers. I think the test is broken):
Catwalk God(ess) 64% Flamboyance, 67% Originality, 52% Deliberateness, 59% Sexiness |
[Flamboyant Original Deliberate Sexy] You know fashion inside out but you're far from being its slave. To you fashion is what you decide to wear. You've got great, if unconventional, taste and plenty of courage to put your ideas into practice, which inspires admiration; but few have guts to copycat you. I suppose it doesn't worry you because to you originality counts. You are self-confident, perhaps even arrogant, and consider a day wasted when no one gives you an interested or shocked look. Great job. The opposite style from yours is Librarian [Tasteful Conventional Random Prissy]. All the categories: Librarian Sporty Hottie Office Master Uptown Girl/ Boy Brainy Student Movie Star Fashionista Glamorous Soul Fashion Enemy Bar Cruiser Kid Next Door Sex Bomb Hippie Kid Fashion Rebel Fashion Artist Catwalk God(ess) |
![]() |
This test tracked 4 variables. How the score compared to the other people's:
| Higher than 87% on Flamboyance | ||
| Higher than 85% on Originality | ||
| Higher than 30% on Deliberateness | ||
| Higher than 67% on Sexiness |
| Link: The Fashion Style Test written by mari-e on Ok Cupid View My Profile(mari-e) |
Sunday, May 04, 2008
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Tuesday, April 08, 2008
Fashionable.
As one who has sworn up and down I would not wear these rubbery, hideous, produced by a company owned by Republicans faux-footwear, I am all kinds of embarrassed by how much I want these:

Except, you know. Not silver.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


